Prozac wrote:Are these the Miss Universe 2021 Judges? I was trying to research who they are but nothing concrete like
it's coming from some reliable sources. In previous years we used to know them earlier, but this time the
final list of jurists was held in secrecy ... it becomes a mystery thriller
So far these are the names that came out, though it is unconfirmed, I took their names, and by doing so,
somebody can correct us as we go along. I reiterate this is an unconfirmed list, we don't want to peddle
fake news here. Thanks.
*Coco Rocha - Canadian supermodel and founder of Coco Rocha model camp
*Iris Mittenaere - Miss Universe 2016
*Lyrica Okano - American actress
*Marian Rivera - Filipino Actress
*Daniel Rubino - Executive editor of Windows Central
*Patrick Starr - Beauty Vlogger
*Tali Eshkoli - Israeli TV producer
LonFlores wrote:Prozac wrote:Are these the Miss Universe 2021 Judges? I was trying to research who they are but nothing concrete like
it's coming from some reliable sources. In previous years we used to know them earlier, but this time the
final list of jurists was held in secrecy ... it becomes a mystery thriller
So far these are the names that came out, though it is unconfirmed, I took their names, and by doing so,
somebody can correct us as we go along. I reiterate this is an unconfirmed list, we don't want to peddle
fake news here. Thanks.
*Coco Rocha - Canadian supermodel and founder of Coco Rocha model camp
*Iris Mittenaere - Miss Universe 2016
*Lyrica Okano - American actress
*Marian Rivera - Filipino Actress
*Daniel Rubino - Executive editor of Windows Central
*Patrick Starr - Beauty Vlogger
*Tali Eshkoli - Israeli TV producer
Overall, not very credible.
beautywatchnyc wrote:LonFlores wrote:Prozac wrote:Are these the Miss Universe 2021 Judges? I was trying to research who they are but nothing concrete like
it's coming from some reliable sources. In previous years we used to know them earlier, but this time the
final list of jurists was held in secrecy ... it becomes a mystery thriller
So far these are the names that came out, though it is unconfirmed, I took their names, and by doing so,
somebody can correct us as we go along. I reiterate this is an unconfirmed list, we don't want to peddle
fake news here. Thanks.
*Coco Rocha - Canadian supermodel and founder of Coco Rocha model camp
*Iris Mittenaere - Miss Universe 2016
*Lyrica Okano - American actress
*Marian Rivera - Filipino Actress
*Daniel Rubino - Executive editor of Windows Central
*Patrick Starr - Beauty Vlogger
*Tali Eshkoli - Israeli TV producer
Overall, not very credible.
Can you educate us on what's credible? Refrain from using your own standards, because if you do then that leaves much to be desired. What can you tell us about the "internationally accepted" standards which meet the criteria of credibility?
Prozac wrote:beautywatchnyc wrote:LonFlores wrote:Prozac wrote:Are these the Miss Universe 2021 Judges? I was trying to research who they are but nothing concrete like
it's coming from some reliable sources. In previous years we used to know them earlier, but this time the
final list of jurists was held in secrecy ... it becomes a mystery thriller
So far these are the names that came out, though it is unconfirmed, I took their names, and by doing so,
somebody can correct us as we go along. I reiterate this is an unconfirmed list, we don't want to peddle
fake news here. Thanks.
*Coco Rocha - Canadian supermodel and founder of Coco Rocha model camp
*Iris Mittenaere - Miss Universe 2016
*Lyrica Okano - American actress
*Marian Rivera - Filipino Actress
*Daniel Rubino - Executive editor of Windows Central
*Patrick Starr - Beauty Vlogger
*Tali Eshkoli - Israeli TV producer
Overall, not very credible.
Can you educate us on what's credible? Refrain from using your own standards, because if you do then that leaves much to be desired. What can you tell us about the "internationally accepted" standards which meet the criteria of credibility?
His comment can be interpreted in different ways. What beautywatchny said was one.
I have a different interpretation. Maybe what he meant was my report was not credible. I am not being defensive,
here but I warn the readers in several ways.
1. The title says Rumored Judges - so the list maybe can be right or wrong.
2. I also reiterated: "Nothing concrete yet ... it should come from reliable sources.
3. I also emphasized "unconfirmed report ..."
4. And I made it more emphatic when I highlighted: We don't want to peddle fake news here.
So what more should I say to make everything RIGHT? I hope this is not what you meant!
[b]
TopTgirl wrote: THAT MEANS MISS PHILIPPINES BEATRICE HAVE A BIG CHANCE OF GETTING THE CROWN BECAUSE OF THE FILIPINO ACTRESS AND STARR IS ALSO A FILIPINO?
batobato wrote:TopTgirl wrote: THAT MEANS MISS PHILIPPINES BEATRICE HAVE A BIG CHANCE OF GETTING THE CROWN BECAUSE OF THE FILIPINO ACTRESS AND STARR IS ALSO A FILIPINO?
Nope. Bea will have a chance of getting the crown if she do well on preliminaries and closed-door interview. Winning is not only based on hard work, luck also plays a big role
poker_man wrote:Two Pinoy Judges means that a Filipina can win. Catriona Gray even went home using the judge's private jet.
esperasave wrote:Prozac wrote:beautywatchnyc wrote:LonFlores wrote:Prozac wrote:Are these the Miss Universe 2021 Judges? I was trying to research who they are but nothing concrete like
it's coming from some reliable sources. In previous years we used to know them earlier, but this time the
final list of jurists was held in secrecy ... it becomes a mystery thriller
So far these are the names that came out, though it is unconfirmed, I took their names, and by doing so,
somebody can correct us as we go along. I reiterate this is an unconfirmed list, we don't want to peddle
fake news here. Thanks.
*Coco Rocha - Canadian supermodel and founder of Coco Rocha model camp
*Iris Mittenaere - Miss Universe 2016
*Lyrica Okano - American actress
*Marian Rivera - Filipino Actress
*Daniel Rubino - Executive editor of Windows Central
*Patrick Starr - Beauty Vlogger
*Tali Eshkoli - Israeli TV producer
Overall, not very credible.
Can you educate us on what's credible? Refrain from using your own standards, because if you do then that leaves much to be desired. What can you tell us about the "internationally accepted" standards which meet the criteria of credibility?
His comment can be interpreted in different ways. What beautywatchny said was one.
I have a different interpretation. Maybe what he meant was my report was not credible. I am not being defensive,
here but I warn the readers in several ways.
1. The title says Rumored Judges - so the list maybe can be right or wrong.
2. I also reiterated: "Nothing concrete yet ... it should come from reliable sources.
3. I also emphasized "unconfirmed report ..."
4. And I made it more emphatic when I highlighted: We don't want to peddle fake news here.
So what more should I say to make everything RIGHT? I hope this is not what you meant!
[b]
Beautywatchnyc posts are mostly misleading because almost all of his views are jargons. If you read his messages, it will lead you as being lost in the woods. It's not an intelligent write ups but it's just a full of fancy words. Likewise, his sentence constructions are very outdated. It's Shakespearean in nature as in sonnets or proses in his style of delivery. It's not relatable to all not unless you are in an English literature class.
LonFlores wrote:esperasave wrote:Prozac wrote:beautywatchnyc wrote:LonFlores wrote:Prozac wrote:Are these the Miss Universe 2021 Judges? I was trying to research who they are but nothing concrete like
it's coming from some reliable sources. In previous years we used to know them earlier, but this time the
final list of jurists was held in secrecy ... it becomes a mystery thriller
So far these are the names that came out, though it is unconfirmed, I took their names, and by doing so,
somebody can correct us as we go along. I reiterate this is an unconfirmed list, we don't want to peddle
fake news here. Thanks.
*Coco Rocha - Canadian supermodel and founder of Coco Rocha model camp
*Iris Mittenaere - Miss Universe 2016
*Lyrica Okano - American actress
*Marian Rivera - Filipino Actress
*Daniel Rubino - Executive editor of Windows Central
*Patrick Starr - Beauty Vlogger
*Tali Eshkoli - Israeli TV producer
Overall, not very credible.
Can you educate us on what's credible? Refrain from using your own standards, because if you do then that leaves much to be desired. What can you tell us about the "internationally accepted" standards which meet the criteria of credibility?
His comment can be interpreted in different ways. What beautywatchny said was one.
I have a different interpretation. Maybe what he meant was my report was not credible. I am not being defensive,
here but I warn the readers in several ways.
1. The title says Rumored Judges - so the list maybe can be right or wrong.
2. I also reiterated: "Nothing concrete yet ... it should come from reliable sources.
3. I also emphasized "unconfirmed report ..."
4. And I made it more emphatic when I highlighted: We don't want to peddle fake news here.
So what more should I say to make everything RIGHT? I hope this is not what you meant!
[b]
Beautywatchnyc posts are mostly misleading because almost all of his views are jargons. If you read his messages, it will lead you as being lost in the woods. It's not an intelligent write ups but it's just a full of fancy words. Likewise, his sentence constructions are very outdated. It's Shakespearean in nature as in sonnets or proses in his style of delivery. It's not relatable to all not unless you are in an English literature class.
Sinabi mo pa Espe. Makatapon lang nf English words and phrases feeling high and mighty na. HAHAHAHAHA.
esperasave wrote:Prozac wrote:beautywatchnyc wrote:LonFlores wrote:Prozac wrote:Are these the Miss Universe 2021 Judges? I was trying to research who they are but nothing concrete like
it's coming from some reliable sources. In previous years we used to know them earlier, but this time the
final list of jurists was held in secrecy ... it becomes a mystery thriller
So far these are the names that came out, though it is unconfirmed, I took their names, and by doing so,
somebody can correct us as we go along. I reiterate this is an unconfirmed list, we don't want to peddle
fake news here. Thanks.
*Coco Rocha - Canadian supermodel and founder of Coco Rocha model camp
*Iris Mittenaere - Miss Universe 2016
*Lyrica Okano - American actress
*Marian Rivera - Filipino Actress
*Daniel Rubino - Executive editor of Windows Central
*Patrick Starr - Beauty Vlogger
*Tali Eshkoli - Israeli TV producer
Overall, not very credible.
Can you educate us on what's credible? Refrain from using your own standards, because if you do then that leaves much to be desired. What can you tell us about the "internationally accepted" standards which meet the criteria of credibility?
His comment can be interpreted in different ways. What beautywatchny said was one.
I have a different interpretation. Maybe what he meant was my report was not credible. I am not being defensive,
here but I warn the readers in several ways.
1. The title says Rumored Judges - so the list maybe can be right or wrong.
2. I also reiterated: "Nothing concrete yet ... it should come from reliable sources.
3. I also emphasized "unconfirmed report ..."
4. And I made it more emphatic when I highlighted: We don't want to peddle fake news here.
So what more should I say to make everything RIGHT? I hope this is not what you meant!
[b]
Beautywatchnyc posts are mostly misleading because almost all of his views are jargons. If you read his messages, it will lead you as being lost in the woods. It's not an intelligent write ups but it's just a full of fancy words. Likewise, his sentence constructions are very outdated. It's Shakespearean in nature as in sonnets or proses in his style of delivery. It's not relatable to all not unless you are in an English literature class.
sarahmarrow wrote:NO Gal Gadot?
I am disappointed!
beautywatchnyc wrote:LonFlores wrote:esperasave wrote:Prozac wrote:beautywatchnyc wrote:LonFlores wrote:Prozac wrote:Are these the Miss Universe 2021 Judges? I was trying to research who they are but nothing concrete like
it's coming from some reliable sources. In previous years we used to know them earlier, but this time the
final list of jurists was held in secrecy ... it becomes a mystery thriller
So far these are the names that came out, though it is unconfirmed, I took their names, and by doing so,
somebody can correct us as we go along. I reiterate this is an unconfirmed list, we don't want to peddle
fake news here. Thanks.
*Coco Rocha - Canadian supermodel and founder of Coco Rocha model camp
*Iris Mittenaere - Miss Universe 2016
*Lyrica Okano - American actress
*Marian Rivera - Filipino Actress
*Daniel Rubino - Executive editor of Windows Central
*Patrick Starr - Beauty Vlogger
*Tali Eshkoli - Israeli TV producer
Overall, not very credible.
Can you educate us on what's credible? Refrain from using your own standards, because if you do then that leaves much to be desired. What can you tell us about the "internationally accepted" standards which meet the criteria of credibility?
His comment can be interpreted in different ways. What beautywatchny said was one.
I have a different interpretation. Maybe what he meant was my report was not credible. I am not being defensive,
here but I warn the readers in several ways.
1. The title says Rumored Judges - so the list maybe can be right or wrong.
2. I also reiterated: "Nothing concrete yet ... it should come from reliable sources.
3. I also emphasized "unconfirmed report ..."
4. And I made it more emphatic when I highlighted: We don't want to peddle fake news here.
So what more should I say to make everything RIGHT? I hope this is not what you meant!
[b]
Beautywatchnyc posts are mostly misleading because almost all of his views are jargons. If you read his messages, it will lead you as being lost in the woods. It's not an intelligent write ups but it's just a full of fancy words. Likewise, his sentence constructions are very outdated. It's Shakespearean in nature as in sonnets or proses in his style of delivery. It's not relatable to all not unless you are in an English literature class.
Sinabi mo pa Espe. Makatapon lang nf English words and phrases feeling high and mighty na. HAHAHAHAHA.
Sorry, but not sorry. Your perception of me is not my responsibility. Nothing personal, stick to the issue at hand, if you can.
Esperasavage:- Dun sa isang thread you were chastised, "You bring your nonsense to every thread, and people tolerate you." Ponder on that, di mo sinagot, iniwasan mo Teh!
Talk to me once you've set foot in the balmy waters of the Red Sea or on revered grounds. Let's compare notes after then. And, please do not drown these pages with rhetorics on Mid-East politics that tend to blur. Not even your allegorical references to the Holy Book match up. Why? It's because you rely on assumptions that disparage (hello Google, or Wiki search?) Truth be told:- you haven't lived nor breathed of the actual experience as it occurs on the ground. Your scant knowledge about the Mid-East tells and frankly that's worrisome. Do better next time!
esperasave wrote:beautywatchnyc wrote:LonFlores wrote:esperasave wrote:Prozac wrote:beautywatchnyc wrote:LonFlores wrote:Prozac wrote:Are these the Miss Universe 2021 Judges? I was trying to research who they are but nothing concrete like
it's coming from some reliable sources. In previous years we used to know them earlier, but this time the
final list of jurists was held in secrecy ... it becomes a mystery thriller
So far these are the names that came out, though it is unconfirmed, I took their names, and by doing so,
somebody can correct us as we go along. I reiterate this is an unconfirmed list, we don't want to peddle
fake news here. Thanks.
*Coco Rocha - Canadian supermodel and founder of Coco Rocha model camp
*Iris Mittenaere - Miss Universe 2016
*Lyrica Okano - American actress
*Marian Rivera - Filipino Actress
*Daniel Rubino - Executive editor of Windows Central
*Patrick Starr - Beauty Vlogger
*Tali Eshkoli - Israeli TV producer
Overall, not very credible.
Can you educate us on what's credible? Refrain from using your own standards, because if you do then that leaves much to be desired. What can you tell us about the "internationally accepted" standards which meet the criteria of credibility?
His comment can be interpreted in different ways. What beautywatchny said was one.
I have a different interpretation. Maybe what he meant was my report was not credible. I am not being defensive,
here but I warn the readers in several ways.
1. The title says Rumored Judges - so the list maybe can be right or wrong.
2. I also reiterated: "Nothing concrete yet ... it should come from reliable sources.
3. I also emphasized "unconfirmed report ..."
4. And I made it more emphatic when I highlighted: We don't want to peddle fake news here.
So what more should I say to make everything RIGHT? I hope this is not what you meant!
[b]
Beautywatchnyc posts are mostly misleading because almost all of his views are jargons. If you read his messages, it will lead you as being lost in the woods. It's not an intelligent write ups but it's just a full of fancy words. Likewise, his sentence constructions are very outdated. It's Shakespearean in nature as in sonnets or proses in his style of delivery. It's not relatable to all not unless you are in an English literature class.
Sinabi mo pa Espe. Makatapon lang nf English words and phrases feeling high and mighty na. HAHAHAHAHA.
Sorry, but not sorry. Your perception of me is not my responsibility. Nothing personal, stick to the issue at hand, if you can.
Esperasavage:- Dun sa isang thread you were chastised, "You bring your nonsense to every thread, and people tolerate you." Ponder on that, di mo sinagot, iniwasan mo Teh!
Talk to me once you've set foot in the balmy waters of the Red Sea or on revered grounds. Let's compare notes after then. And, please do not drown these pages with rhetorics on Mid-East politics that tend to blur. Not even your allegorical references to the Holy Book match up. Why? It's because you rely on assumptions that disparage (hello Google, or Wiki search?) Truth be told:- you haven't lived nor breathed of the actual experience as it occurs on the ground. Your scant knowledge about the Mid-East tells and frankly that's worrisome. Do better next time!
My sources are all credible and factual in nature. But how could I believe with some people when all you hear is toxicities, negativities and bashing? Besides, I don't have to live in every country so I could assess their situations because I have lived here in The USA for 20 years and this is a country of so many Nations, 150 nations and still counting that have lived here.
goddessoxana27 wrote:esperasave wrote:beautywatchnyc wrote:LonFlores wrote:esperasave wrote:Prozac wrote:beautywatchnyc wrote:LonFlores wrote:Prozac wrote:Are these the Miss Universe 2021 Judges? I was trying to research who they are but nothing concrete like
it's coming from some reliable sources. In previous years we used to know them earlier, but this time the
final list of jurists was held in secrecy ... it becomes a mystery thriller
So far these are the names that came out, though it is unconfirmed, I took their names, and by doing so,
somebody can correct us as we go along. I reiterate this is an unconfirmed list, we don't want to peddle
fake news here. Thanks.
*Coco Rocha - Canadian supermodel and founder of Coco Rocha model camp
*Iris Mittenaere - Miss Universe 2016
*Lyrica Okano - American actress
*Marian Rivera - Filipino Actress
*Daniel Rubino - Executive editor of Windows Central
*Patrick Starr - Beauty Vlogger
*Tali Eshkoli - Israeli TV producer
Overall, not very credible.
Can you educate us on what's credible? Refrain from using your own standards, because if you do then that leaves much to be desired. What can you tell us about the "internationally accepted" standards which meet the criteria of credibility?
His comment can be interpreted in different ways. What beautywatchny said was one.
I have a different interpretation. Maybe what he meant was my report was not credible. I am not being defensive,
here but I warn the readers in several ways.
1. The title says Rumored Judges - so the list maybe can be right or wrong.
2. I also reiterated: "Nothing concrete yet ... it should come from reliable sources.
3. I also emphasized "unconfirmed report ..."
4. And I made it more emphatic when I highlighted: We don't want to peddle fake news here.
So what more should I say to make everything RIGHT? I hope this is not what you meant!
[b]
Beautywatchnyc posts are mostly misleading because almost all of his views are jargons. If you read his messages, it will lead you as being lost in the woods. It's not an intelligent write ups but it's just a full of fancy words. Likewise, his sentence constructions are very outdated. It's Shakespearean in nature as in sonnets or proses in his style of delivery. It's not relatable to all not unless you are in an English literature class.
Sinabi mo pa Espe. Makatapon lang nf English words and phrases feeling high and mighty na. HAHAHAHAHA.
Sorry, but not sorry. Your perception of me is not my responsibility. Nothing personal, stick to the issue at hand, if you can.
Esperasavage:- Dun sa isang thread you were chastised, "You bring your nonsense to every thread, and people tolerate you." Ponder on that, di mo sinagot, iniwasan mo Teh!
Talk to me once you've set foot in the balmy waters of the Red Sea or on revered grounds. Let's compare notes after then. And, please do not drown these pages with rhetorics on Mid-East politics that tend to blur. Not even your allegorical references to the Holy Book match up. Why? It's because you rely on assumptions that disparage (hello Google, or Wiki search?) Truth be told:- you haven't lived nor breathed of the actual experience as it occurs on the ground. Your scant knowledge about the Mid-East tells and frankly that's worrisome. Do better next time!
My sources are all credible and factual in nature. But how could I believe with some people when all you hear is toxicities, negativities and bashing? Besides, I don't have to live in every country so I could assess their situations because I have lived here in The USA for 20 years and this is a country of so many Nations, 150 nations and still counting that have lived here.
what's next? you borrowed Karen Ibasco's wardrobes,
wear it with a poise.....
and you will announce here nonstop
that you're a certified US-citizen
owkei!!!!
esperasave wrote:goddessoxana27 wrote:esperasave wrote:beautywatchnyc wrote:LonFlores wrote:esperasave wrote:Prozac wrote:beautywatchnyc wrote:LonFlores wrote:Prozac wrote:Are these the Miss Universe 2021 Judges? I was trying to research who they are but nothing concrete like
it's coming from some reliable sources. In previous years we used to know them earlier, but this time the
final list of jurists was held in secrecy ... it becomes a mystery thriller
So far these are the names that came out, though it is unconfirmed, I took their names, and by doing so,
somebody can correct us as we go along. I reiterate this is an unconfirmed list, we don't want to peddle
fake news here. Thanks.
*Coco Rocha - Canadian supermodel and founder of Coco Rocha model camp
*Iris Mittenaere - Miss Universe 2016
*Lyrica Okano - American actress
*Marian Rivera - Filipino Actress
*Daniel Rubino - Executive editor of Windows Central
*Patrick Starr - Beauty Vlogger
*Tali Eshkoli - Israeli TV producer
Overall, not very credible.
Can you educate us on what's credible? Refrain from using your own standards, because if you do then that leaves much to be desired. What can you tell us about the "internationally accepted" standards which meet the criteria of credibility?
His comment can be interpreted in different ways. What beautywatchny said was one.
I have a different interpretation. Maybe what he meant was my report was not credible. I am not being defensive,
here but I warn the readers in several ways.
1. The title says Rumored Judges - so the list maybe can be right or wrong.
2. I also reiterated: "Nothing concrete yet ... it should come from reliable sources.
3. I also emphasized "unconfirmed report ..."
4. And I made it more emphatic when I highlighted: We don't want to peddle fake news here.
So what more should I say to make everything RIGHT? I hope this is not what you meant!
[b]
Beautywatchnyc posts are mostly misleading because almost all of his views are jargons. If you read his messages, it will lead you as being lost in the woods. It's not an intelligent write ups but it's just a full of fancy words. Likewise, his sentence constructions are very outdated. It's Shakespearean in nature as in sonnets or proses in his style of delivery. It's not relatable to all not unless you are in an English literature class.
Sinabi mo pa Espe. Makatapon lang nf English words and phrases feeling high and mighty na. HAHAHAHAHA.
Sorry, but not sorry. Your perception of me is not my responsibility. Nothing personal, stick to the issue at hand, if you can.
Esperasavage:- Dun sa isang thread you were chastised, "You bring your nonsense to every thread, and people tolerate you." Ponder on that, di mo sinagot, iniwasan mo Teh!
Talk to me once you've set foot in the balmy waters of the Red Sea or on revered grounds. Let's compare notes after then. And, please do not drown these pages with rhetorics on Mid-East politics that tend to blur. Not even your allegorical references to the Holy Book match up. Why? It's because you rely on assumptions that disparage (hello Google, or Wiki search?) Truth be told:- you haven't lived nor breathed of the actual experience as it occurs on the ground. Your scant knowledge about the Mid-East tells and frankly that's worrisome. Do better next time!
My sources are all credible and factual in nature. But how could I believe with some people when all you hear is toxicities, negativities and bashing? Besides, I don't have to live in every country so I could assess their situations because I have lived here in The USA for 20 years and this is a country of so many Nations, 150 nations and still counting that have lived here.
what's next? you borrowed Karen Ibasco's wardrobes,
wear it with a poise.....
and you will announce here nonstop
that you're a certified US-citizen
owkei!!!!
You're a basher of Karen. That's all you gonna do for the rest of your life, To Bash till you drop.
goddessoxana27 wrote:esperasave wrote:goddessoxana27 wrote:esperasave wrote:beautywatchnyc wrote:LonFlores wrote:esperasave wrote:Prozac wrote:beautywatchnyc wrote:LonFlores wrote:Prozac wrote:Are these the Miss Universe 2021 Judges? I was trying to research who they are but nothing concrete like
it's coming from some reliable sources. In previous years we used to know them earlier, but this time the
final list of jurists was held in secrecy ... it becomes a mystery thriller
So far these are the names that came out, though it is unconfirmed, I took their names, and by doing so,
somebody can correct us as we go along. I reiterate this is an unconfirmed list, we don't want to peddle
fake news here. Thanks.
*Coco Rocha - Canadian supermodel and founder of Coco Rocha model camp
*Iris Mittenaere - Miss Universe 2016
*Lyrica Okano - American actress
*Marian Rivera - Filipino Actress
*Daniel Rubino - Executive editor of Windows Central
*Patrick Starr - Beauty Vlogger
*Tali Eshkoli - Israeli TV producer
Overall, not very credible.
Can you educate us on what's credible? Refrain from using your own standards, because if you do then that leaves much to be desired. What can you tell us about the "internationally accepted" standards which meet the criteria of credibility?
His comment can be interpreted in different ways. What beautywatchny said was one.
I have a different interpretation. Maybe what he meant was my report was not credible. I am not being defensive,
here but I warn the readers in several ways.
1. The title says Rumored Judges - so the list maybe can be right or wrong.
2. I also reiterated: "Nothing concrete yet ... it should come from reliable sources.
3. I also emphasized "unconfirmed report ..."
4. And I made it more emphatic when I highlighted: We don't want to peddle fake news here.
So what more should I say to make everything RIGHT? I hope this is not what you meant!
[b]
Beautywatchnyc posts are mostly misleading because almost all of his views are jargons. If you read his messages, it will lead you as being lost in the woods. It's not an intelligent write ups but it's just a full of fancy words. Likewise, his sentence constructions are very outdated. It's Shakespearean in nature as in sonnets or proses in his style of delivery. It's not relatable to all not unless you are in an English literature class.
Sinabi mo pa Espe. Makatapon lang nf English words and phrases feeling high and mighty na. HAHAHAHAHA.
Sorry, but not sorry. Your perception of me is not my responsibility. Nothing personal, stick to the issue at hand, if you can.
Esperasavage:- Dun sa isang thread you were chastised, "You bring your nonsense to every thread, and people tolerate you." Ponder on that, di mo sinagot, iniwasan mo Teh!
Talk to me once you've set foot in the balmy waters of the Red Sea or on revered grounds. Let's compare notes after then. And, please do not drown these pages with rhetorics on Mid-East politics that tend to blur. Not even your allegorical references to the Holy Book match up. Why? It's because you rely on assumptions that disparage (hello Google, or Wiki search?) Truth be told:- you haven't lived nor breathed of the actual experience as it occurs on the ground. Your scant knowledge about the Mid-East tells and frankly that's worrisome. Do better next time!
My sources are all credible and factual in nature. But how could I believe with some people when all you hear is toxicities, negativities and bashing? Besides, I don't have to live in every country so I could assess their situations because I have lived here in The USA for 20 years and this is a country of so many Nations, 150 nations and still counting that have lived here.
what's next? you borrowed Karen Ibasco's wardrobes,
wear it with a poise.....
and you will announce here nonstop
that you're a certified US-citizen
owkei!!!!
You're a basher of Karen. That's all you gonna do for the rest of your life, To Bash till you drop.
talaga lang ha!!!!
proof?
hindi ko na kailangan ng proof na basher ka ni Karen...
ang tanong kasi... ilan sa alternick mo ang basher ni Karen... hahahahahaha
by the way... ikaw nga pala yung Karen... yung Marites version ng USA
kahit kita sa IP address mo na nasa street ka ng tondo...
esperasave wrote:goddessoxana27 wrote:esperasave wrote:goddessoxana27 wrote:esperasave wrote:beautywatchnyc wrote:LonFlores wrote:esperasave wrote:Prozac wrote:beautywatchnyc wrote:LonFlores wrote:Prozac wrote:Are these the Miss Universe 2021 Judges? I was trying to research who they are but nothing concrete like
it's coming from some reliable sources. In previous years we used to know them earlier, but this time the
final list of jurists was held in secrecy ... it becomes a mystery thriller
So far these are the names that came out, though it is unconfirmed, I took their names, and by doing so,
somebody can correct us as we go along. I reiterate this is an unconfirmed list, we don't want to peddle
fake news here. Thanks.
*Coco Rocha - Canadian supermodel and founder of Coco Rocha model camp
*Iris Mittenaere - Miss Universe 2016
*Lyrica Okano - American actress
*Marian Rivera - Filipino Actress
*Daniel Rubino - Executive editor of Windows Central
*Patrick Starr - Beauty Vlogger
*Tali Eshkoli - Israeli TV producer
Overall, not very credible.
Can you educate us on what's credible? Refrain from using your own standards, because if you do then that leaves much to be desired. What can you tell us about the "internationally accepted" standards which meet the criteria of credibility?
His comment can be interpreted in different ways. What beautywatchny said was one.
I have a different interpretation. Maybe what he meant was my report was not credible. I am not being defensive,
here but I warn the readers in several ways.
1. The title says Rumored Judges - so the list maybe can be right or wrong.
2. I also reiterated: "Nothing concrete yet ... it should come from reliable sources.
3. I also emphasized "unconfirmed report ..."
4. And I made it more emphatic when I highlighted: We don't want to peddle fake news here.
So what more should I say to make everything RIGHT? I hope this is not what you meant!
[b]
Beautywatchnyc posts are mostly misleading because almost all of his views are jargons. If you read his messages, it will lead you as being lost in the woods. It's not an intelligent write ups but it's just a full of fancy words. Likewise, his sentence constructions are very outdated. It's Shakespearean in nature as in sonnets or proses in his style of delivery. It's not relatable to all not unless you are in an English literature class.
Sinabi mo pa Espe. Makatapon lang nf English words and phrases feeling high and mighty na. HAHAHAHAHA.
Sorry, but not sorry. Your perception of me is not my responsibility. Nothing personal, stick to the issue at hand, if you can.
Esperasavage:- Dun sa isang thread you were chastised, "You bring your nonsense to every thread, and people tolerate you." Ponder on that, di mo sinagot, iniwasan mo Teh!
Talk to me once you've set foot in the balmy waters of the Red Sea or on revered grounds. Let's compare notes after then. And, please do not drown these pages with rhetorics on Mid-East politics that tend to blur. Not even your allegorical references to the Holy Book match up. Why? It's because you rely on assumptions that disparage (hello Google, or Wiki search?) Truth be told:- you haven't lived nor breathed of the actual experience as it occurs on the ground. Your scant knowledge about the Mid-East tells and frankly that's worrisome. Do better next time!
My sources are all credible and factual in nature. But how could I believe with some people when all you hear is toxicities, negativities and bashing? Besides, I don't have to live in every country so I could assess their situations because I have lived here in The USA for 20 years and this is a country of so many Nations, 150 nations and still counting that have lived here.
what's next? you borrowed Karen Ibasco's wardrobes,
wear it with a poise.....
and you will announce here nonstop
that you're a certified US-citizen
owkei!!!!
You're a basher of Karen. That's all you gonna do for the rest of your life, To Bash till you drop.
talaga lang ha!!!!
proof?
hindi ko na kailangan ng proof na basher ka ni Karen...
ang tanong kasi... ilan sa alternick mo ang basher ni Karen... hahahahahaha
by the way... ikaw nga pala yung Karen... yung Marites version ng USA
kahit kita sa IP address mo na nasa street ka ng tondo...
Gumising ka sa katotohanan. Hindi yung gawa gawa lang ng imagination mo. Bumangon ka sa mundo.
goddessoxana27 wrote:esperasave wrote:goddessoxana27 wrote:esperasave wrote:goddessoxana27 wrote:esperasave wrote:beautywatchnyc wrote:LonFlores wrote:esperasave wrote:Prozac wrote:beautywatchnyc wrote:LonFlores wrote:Prozac wrote:Are these the Miss Universe 2021 Judges? I was trying to research who they are but nothing concrete like
it's coming from some reliable sources. In previous years we used to know them earlier, but this time the
final list of jurists was held in secrecy ... it becomes a mystery thriller
So far these are the names that came out, though it is unconfirmed, I took their names, and by doing so,
somebody can correct us as we go along. I reiterate this is an unconfirmed list, we don't want to peddle
fake news here. Thanks.
*Coco Rocha - Canadian supermodel and founder of Coco Rocha model camp
*Iris Mittenaere - Miss Universe 2016
*Lyrica Okano - American actress
*Marian Rivera - Filipino Actress
*Daniel Rubino - Executive editor of Windows Central
*Patrick Starr - Beauty Vlogger
*Tali Eshkoli - Israeli TV producer
Overall, not very credible.
Can you educate us on what's credible? Refrain from using your own standards, because if you do then that leaves much to be desired. What can you tell us about the "internationally accepted" standards which meet the criteria of credibility?
His comment can be interpreted in different ways. What beautywatchny said was one.
I have a different interpretation. Maybe what he meant was my report was not credible. I am not being defensive,
here but I warn the readers in several ways.
1. The title says Rumored Judges - so the list maybe can be right or wrong.
2. I also reiterated: "Nothing concrete yet ... it should come from reliable sources.
3. I also emphasized "unconfirmed report ..."
4. And I made it more emphatic when I highlighted: We don't want to peddle fake news here.
So what more should I say to make everything RIGHT? I hope this is not what you meant!
[b]
Beautywatchnyc posts are mostly misleading because almost all of his views are jargons. If you read his messages, it will lead you as being lost in the woods. It's not an intelligent write ups but it's just a full of fancy words. Likewise, his sentence constructions are very outdated. It's Shakespearean in nature as in sonnets or proses in his style of delivery. It's not relatable to all not unless you are in an English literature class.
Sinabi mo pa Espe. Makatapon lang nf English words and phrases feeling high and mighty na. HAHAHAHAHA.
Sorry, but not sorry. Your perception of me is not my responsibility. Nothing personal, stick to the issue at hand, if you can.
Esperasavage:- Dun sa isang thread you were chastised, "You bring your nonsense to every thread, and people tolerate you." Ponder on that, di mo sinagot, iniwasan mo Teh!
Talk to me once you've set foot in the balmy waters of the Red Sea or on revered grounds. Let's compare notes after then. And, please do not drown these pages with rhetorics on Mid-East politics that tend to blur. Not even your allegorical references to the Holy Book match up. Why? It's because you rely on assumptions that disparage (hello Google, or Wiki search?) Truth be told:- you haven't lived nor breathed of the actual experience as it occurs on the ground. Your scant knowledge about the Mid-East tells and frankly that's worrisome. Do better next time!
My sources are all credible and factual in nature. But how could I believe with some people when all you hear is toxicities, negativities and bashing? Besides, I don't have to live in every country so I could assess their situations because I have lived here in The USA for 20 years and this is a country of so many Nations, 150 nations and still counting that have lived here.
what's next? you borrowed Karen Ibasco's wardrobes,
wear it with a poise.....
and you will announce here nonstop
that you're a certified US-citizen
owkei!!!!
You're a basher of Karen. That's all you gonna do for the rest of your life, To Bash till you drop.
talaga lang ha!!!!
proof?
hindi ko na kailangan ng proof na basher ka ni Karen...
ang tanong kasi... ilan sa alternick mo ang basher ni Karen... hahahahahaha
by the way... ikaw nga pala yung Karen... yung Marites version ng USA
kahit kita sa IP address mo na nasa street ka ng tondo...
Gumising ka sa katotohanan. Hindi yung gawa gawa lang ng imagination mo. Bumangon ka sa mundo.
TANGA!
ikaw ang nahihibang!!!
kung anu-ano na naman ang pinopost mo...
Users browsing this forum: Antoniolpd, dankoSoisp, pslhit, your_hotness