XAMURAI wrote:Damn,... it's a no brainer! BOLLYWOOD is a multi-billion business and the opportunities are endless! You are representing a market that is based in India, with more than ONE BILLION people! That's not to include Pakistan, Bangladesh, Nepal and Sri Lanka who are also huge Bollywood fans!
Iknowbeauty wrote:XAMURAI wrote:Damn,... it's a no brainer! BOLLYWOOD is a multi-billion business and the opportunities are endless! You are representing a market that is based in India, with more than ONE BILLION people! That's not to include Pakistan, Bangladesh, Nepal and Sri Lanka who are also huge Bollywood fans!
And that is exactly my point. Has me questioning if pageants are still beneficial to Indian women as they may be for other countries. You don't need to win or enter pageants to make it in Bollywood. Sadly pageants seem to be turning into just another hurdle before making it into the film industry.
XAMURAI wrote:Iknowbeauty wrote:XAMURAI wrote:Damn,... it's a no brainer! BOLLYWOOD is a multi-billion business and the opportunities are endless! You are representing a market that is based in India, with more than ONE BILLION people! That's not to include Pakistan, Bangladesh, Nepal and Sri Lanka who are also huge Bollywood fans!
And that is exactly my point. Has me questioning if pageants are still beneficial to Indian women as they may be for other countries. You don't need to win or enter pageants to make it in Bollywood. Sadly pageants seem to be turning into just another hurdle before making it into the film industry.
In general, beauty pageants in India are not that lucrative anymore. I know of former Miss International and Miss Earth India winners who are now doing well in Bollywood despite not placing in their respective international pageant. Jhataleka and Sobhita, to name two! It's not really about the result that would matter anymore. In Bollywood, if you have the looks, the talent and the right attitude, you will make it big in the industry. However, it can't be denied that the Femina Miss India experience has helped paved the way for these ladies to earn a spot in Bollywood.
Iknowbeauty wrote:XAMURAI wrote:Iknowbeauty wrote:XAMURAI wrote:Damn,... it's a no brainer! BOLLYWOOD is a multi-billion business and the opportunities are endless! You are representing a market that is based in India, with more than ONE BILLION people! That's not to include Pakistan, Bangladesh, Nepal and Sri Lanka who are also huge Bollywood fans!
And that is exactly my point. Has me questioning if pageants are still beneficial to Indian women as they may be for other countries. You don't need to win or enter pageants to make it in Bollywood. Sadly pageants seem to be turning into just another hurdle before making it into the film industry.
In general, beauty pageants in India are not that lucrative anymore. I know of former Miss International and Miss Earth India winners who are now doing well in Bollywood despite not placing in their respective international pageant. Jhataleka and Sobhita, to name two! It's not really about the result that would matter anymore. In Bollywood, if you have the looks, the talent and the right attitude, you will make it big in the industry. However, it can't be denied that the Femina Miss India experience has helped paved the way for these ladies to earn a spot in Bollywood.
I think for girls who want the whole pageant experience obviously pageants are for them, but for girls who are using pageants as stepping stool to be in Bollywood, I'd advice skip pageants & go straight to Bollywood. They've been conditioned to think this is way to do it because they are trying to follow the path of Lara, Sush, Aish, Priyanka but its not necessary these days at all. Going straight to Bollywood seems better option than some pageants like Miss Universe sadly, who seem to be holding on by a thread these days.
esperasave wrote:Miss Universe Org boxed their winners to be involved in Socio-economic issues of The World nowadays. Unlike MUO under Catalina SwimWear and Gulf + Pacific Winners in the past several decades ago, their Winners were being used for Commercials to sell Women products and Services so most of them became famous Actresses in Hollywood with Film and Television credits like Angela Visser, Margarette Gardner, Cecilia Bolocco etc. With Urvasi, she outsmarted The Winner Pia W. to use her talents, beauty and connections in Bollywood to gain ticket for Cannes entry with her film because she's not boxed in for any Socio-economic issues in her country. But if she could cross over to Hollywood, it would be a great achievement because the competition is so tight. She has to compete with hundreds of American born Actresses to be famous there. In fact, Gal Gadot was the pioneer in that premise to have a film credit in Hollywood with her successful movie worldwide. However, Urvasi has not penetrated the Hollywood market yet at this time for worldwide exposure.
esperasave wrote:Miss Universe Org boxed their winners to be involved in Socio-economic issues of The World nowadays. Unlike MUO under Catalina SwimWear and Gulf + Pacific Winners in the past several decades ago, their Winners were being used for Commercials to sell Women products and Services so most of them became famous Actresses in Hollywood with Film and Television credits like Angela Visser, Margarette Gardner, Cecilia Bolocco etc. With Urvasi, she outsmarted The Winner Pia W. to use her talents, beauty and connections in Bollywood to gain ticket for Cannes entry with her film because she's not boxed in for any Socio-economic issues in her country. But if she could cross over to Hollywood, it would be a great achievement because the competition is so tight. She has to compete with hundreds of American born Actresses to be famous there. In fact, Gal Gadot was the pioneer in that premise to have a film credit in Hollywood with her successful movie worldwide. However, Urvasi has not penetrated the Hollywood market yet at this time for worldwide exposure.
ajsy0203 wrote:esperasave wrote:Miss Universe Org boxed their winners to be involved in Socio-economic issues of The World nowadays. Unlike MUO under Catalina SwimWear and Gulf + Pacific Winners in the past several decades ago, their Winners were being used for Commercials to sell Women products and Services so most of them became famous Actresses in Hollywood with Film and Television credits like Angela Visser, Margarette Gardner, Cecilia Bolocco etc. With Urvasi, she outsmarted The Winner Pia W. to use her talents, beauty and connections in Bollywood to gain ticket for Cannes entry with her film because she's not boxed in for any Socio-economic issues in her country. But if she could cross over to Hollywood, it would be a great achievement because the competition is so tight. She has to compete with hundreds of American born Actresses to be famous there. In fact, Gal Gadot was the pioneer in that premise to have a film credit in Hollywood with her successful movie worldwide. However, Urvasi has not penetrated the Hollywood market yet at this time for worldwide exposure.
"Losing is the New Winning"?
Logical or Illogical argument: Hollywood and Bollywood were the standard in finding a successful post-pageant career and claimed to be better career than actual pageant winners?
Like:
1. Halle Berry was more successful than Christy Fichtner and Giselle Laronde?
2. Aishwarya Rai was more successful than Sushmita Sen?
3. Priyanka Chopra was more successful than Lara Dutta?
4. Gal Gadot was more successful than Jennifer Hawkins?
5. Jacqueline Fernandez was more successful than Zuleyka Rivera?
XAMURAI wrote:ajsy0203 wrote:esperasave wrote:Miss Universe Org boxed their winners to be involved in Socio-economic issues of The World nowadays. Unlike MUO under Catalina SwimWear and Gulf + Pacific Winners in the past several decades ago, their Winners were being used for Commercials to sell Women products and Services so most of them became famous Actresses in Hollywood with Film and Television credits like Angela Visser, Margarette Gardner, Cecilia Bolocco etc. With Urvasi, she outsmarted The Winner Pia W. to use her talents, beauty and connections in Bollywood to gain ticket for Cannes entry with her film because she's not boxed in for any Socio-economic issues in her country. But if she could cross over to Hollywood, it would be a great achievement because the competition is so tight. She has to compete with hundreds of American born Actresses to be famous there. In fact, Gal Gadot was the pioneer in that premise to have a film credit in Hollywood with her successful movie worldwide. However, Urvasi has not penetrated the Hollywood market yet at this time for worldwide exposure.
"Losing is the New Winning"?
Logical or Illogical argument: Hollywood and Bollywood were the standard in finding a successful post-pageant career and claimed to be better career than actual pageant winners?
Like:
1. Halle Berry was more successful than Christy Fichtner and Giselle Laronde?
2. Aishwarya Rai was more successful than Sushmita Sen?
3. Priyanka Chopra was more successful than Lara Dutta?
4. Gal Gadot was more successful than Jennifer Hawkins?
5. Jacqueline Fernandez was more successful than Zuleyka Rivera?
Bianca Manalo is more successful than all of her successors (except for Pia and Catriona) who placed well at Miss Universe.
ajsy0203 wrote:esperasave wrote:Miss Universe Org boxed their winners to be involved in Socio-economic issues of The World nowadays. Unlike MUO under Catalina SwimWear and Gulf + Pacific Winners in the past several decades ago, their Winners were being used for Commercials to sell Women products and Services so most of them became famous Actresses in Hollywood with Film and Television credits like Angela Visser, Margarette Gardner, Cecilia Bolocco etc. With Urvasi, she outsmarted The Winner Pia W. to use her talents, beauty and connections in Bollywood to gain ticket for Cannes entry with her film because she's not boxed in for any Socio-economic issues in her country. But if she could cross over to Hollywood, it would be a great achievement because the competition is so tight. She has to compete with hundreds of American born Actresses to be famous there. In fact, Gal Gadot was the pioneer in that premise to have a film credit in Hollywood with her successful movie worldwide. However, Urvasi has not penetrated the Hollywood market yet at this time for worldwide exposure.
"Losing is the New Winning"?
Logical or Illogical argument: Hollywood and Bollywood were the standard in finding a successful post-pageant career and claimed to be better career than actual pageant winners?
Like:
1. Halle Berry was more successful than Christy Fichtner and Giselle Laronde?
2. Aishwarya Rai was more successful than Sushmita Sen?
3. Priyanka Chopra was more successful than Lara Dutta?
4. Gal Gadot was more successful than Jennifer Hawkins?
5. Jacqueline Fernandez was more successful than Zuleyka Rivera?
LonFlores wrote:XAMURAI wrote:ajsy0203 wrote:esperasave wrote:Miss Universe Org boxed their winners to be involved in Socio-economic issues of The World nowadays. Unlike MUO under Catalina SwimWear and Gulf + Pacific Winners in the past several decades ago, their Winners were being used for Commercials to sell Women products and Services so most of them became famous Actresses in Hollywood with Film and Television credits like Angela Visser, Margarette Gardner, Cecilia Bolocco etc. With Urvasi, she outsmarted The Winner Pia W. to use her talents, beauty and connections in Bollywood to gain ticket for Cannes entry with her film because she's not boxed in for any Socio-economic issues in her country. But if she could cross over to Hollywood, it would be a great achievement because the competition is so tight. She has to compete with hundreds of American born Actresses to be famous there. In fact, Gal Gadot was the pioneer in that premise to have a film credit in Hollywood with her successful movie worldwide. However, Urvasi has not penetrated the Hollywood market yet at this time for worldwide exposure.
"Losing is the New Winning"?
Logical or Illogical argument: Hollywood and Bollywood were the standard in finding a successful post-pageant career and claimed to be better career than actual pageant winners?
Like:
1. Halle Berry was more successful than Christy Fichtner and Giselle Laronde?
2. Aishwarya Rai was more successful than Sushmita Sen?
3. Priyanka Chopra was more successful than Lara Dutta?
4. Gal Gadot was more successful than Jennifer Hawkins?
5. Jacqueline Fernandez was more successful than Zuleyka Rivera?
Bianca Manalo is more successful than all of her successors (except for Pia and Catriona) who placed well at Miss Universe.
Huh? Being the GF of politicians is successful?
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot]