by beautywatchnyc » Sun Dec 30, 2018 8:47 am
You are not an influencer and you have no clout to even make a dent. I think that you had this post published a while back. While you made extra effort in reposting, you are in no position to dictate your "whim or caprice" for the organizers to take notice. As a matter of suggestion, your points are well-taken..
It is within the organizers' purview that selection of the judging criteria or composition of the panel of judges is farther from the convenience of a "spur of a moment" decision. I can assure you that considerable time is being expended in determining the factors and weighted averages that go into the overall criteria. It takes excruciating effort on the part of the organizers to weed out any probability that might skew the score sheet to favor a certain delegate or group.
A beauty pageant organization allocates scant resources and valuable time with agonized conscience (as a matter of choice!) in determining the factors and the corresponding weighted averages as criteria for judging. A pageant organization will need to appoint varied personalities with a proven track record of integrity, industry reputation or professional competence spiked with a modicum of success in his respective field of expertise or specialization, to sbe qualified in the panel of judges. The services of a statistician or actuarial specialist may even be engaged to assess the set of verifiable criteria and to evaluate the predetermined corresponding points and weighted averages attributed to each factor. Add, a prospective panelist will undergo a cumbersome background "check" to ascertain particular "bias or prejudice" that may have an adverse effect, hence, affect objective judgement for that matter.
What might you think right for Ms Earth to adopt or any pageant organization to heed, is to me, presumptuous and intrusive if not outright sanctimonious, and frankly, an affront to and over-the-top in my personal opinion.